NJ Residents for Action, Gun Advocates Demonstrate at Congressman Lance's Office
Gun owners and those seeking stronger gun control legislation voiced their opinions.
NJ Residents for Action Against Gun Violence were joined by vocal gun advocates outside Congress Leonard Lance's Westfield office Wednesday afternoon.
The grassroots group, organized by Westfield resident Karen Egert following the shooting massacre at the Newtown, Conn.'s Sandy Hook elementary school, demonstrated to show their support for "common sense gun laws." Their mission includes the following:
- A federal ban on the sale and manufacturing of military-style assault weapons
- A federal ban on the sale and manufacturing of high-capacity ammunition magazines (with a limit of 10 rounds per magazine)
- To get elected officials to fully support The Fix Gun Checks Act (H.R. 137), which would require instant criminal background checks for every gun sale and close the “private sale loophole.”
But gun proponent Greg Ziolkowski Sr. of Metuchen, who was joined by a large crowd of gun owners and advocates, said "it's not about guns, it's about liberty."
"This is about protecting and defending the individual rights that have been handed down to us that we want to hand down to future generations," he said.
Kim Molinelli of Colonia stood beside Ziolkowski with her preschooler Joe, attending his first protest, in his stroller. "I'm in favor of the least amount of federal government involvement possible," she said.
NJ Residents for Action president Karen Egert, who organized the demonstration which began at 1 p.m., said she anticipated opposition as the groups stood side by side. "This is what democracy looks like," she said.
As polarizing as the issue of gun control is, there was even division among those who came out in support of NJ Residents for Action. Gabe Kardos of Mountainside was diagnosed with bipolar disorder in 1977. Since then Kardos said he has been hospitalized 22 times to adjust his medication and find the right “chemical cocktail.”
“I don’t feel guns should be available to those who are not qualified to own them,” he said. “I should not be able to walk into a gun show and buy a gun. I should be kicked out. It’s only fair, just, and practical to prevent people like me from obtaining weapons. If my medication isn’t working and I start thinking everyone is an alien, I shouldn’t be able to get my hands on an AK-47.”
But Tom Crownover of Plainfield does not believe the problem with gun violence has anything to do with mental health. Rather, Crownover said he supports U.S. Representative Adam Schiff’s (D-California) call to limit legal immunity for gun manufacturers and gun distributors.
Crownover explained that in 2005, at the urging of the gun industry, Congress passed, and President George W. Bush signed into law, the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), which limits civil liability suits brought against gun manufacturers, distributors, and retailers.
“Without tort liability, there’s no incentive to make guns safer,” Crownover said. “Congress enables makers and sellers of guns.”
Union County Freeholder Bette Jane Kowalski, who stood alongside NJ Residents for Action, said Union County will soon be announcing a gun buyback day.
“I think the majority of people are on the right side of this issue,” she said.
NJ Residents for Action Against Gun Violence urged supporters to visit their website at njresidentsforaction.com while Ziolkowski suggested gun advocates take a look at http://nj2as.com/.
LKB
5:23 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
Today was another great moment for NJ Residents for Action, for the state of NJ and our country. We had such a nice turn-out in front of Leonard Lance's office. About 45 people came to show their support on the major issues of universal background checks, reduced magazine clips and a ban on assault weapons. Unfortunately we had some uninvited and uneducated foul-mouthed guests show, but fortunately we outnumbered the "others".
Marcus Max
10:34 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
we were foul mouthed? i didn't hear any of us cussing...i did hear some of u guys saying "don't shoot me" with an obnoxious tone.
Nathan Ale
6:21 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
As far as I understood gun advocates outnumbered ur group and stayed longer than an hour.. plus a stranger dropped them off coffee
so i hear
Viviane Levy
7:46 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
We brought our own!
Law Abiding Citizen Against Criminals
6:25 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
You can try to distort the truth but you are still not focusing on criminals and gangs, nobody said your group was "foul-mouthed" please don't spread lies, instead urge that criminals don't return to the streets with a slap on the wrist, thank you!
LC
6:28 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
LKB - what is a "magazine clip?" Seriously, I'd like to know.
I was there today, in support of Congressman Lance's pro 2A stance. I was there the full time - I noticed you all left early - and I know that NO ONE from our side was "foul mouthed." Stick to the issue and stop spewing lies. Isn't your side the one who talks about what's "fair?" You must not feel very confident in your position if you have to lie about our behavior.
Also, since when does an American have to be "invited" to a public sidewalk? Like Greg Ziolkowski said, it's about liberty. Sad that some Americans are so willing to give up their freedoms, but they need to keep their hands off mine.
LKB
7:46 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
LC, According to The Merriam-Webster dictionary now defines a clip as "a device to hold cartridges for charging the magazines of some rifles; also a magazine from which ammunition is fed into the chamber of a firearm." Again reconfirming that many of you NJ2AS supporters should actually become better educated on actually what it is that you support, and why you are attending peaceful rally's like ours today. You claim to be there to defend your right to owning a weapon, and we are a group who isn't fighting that right. If you're going to show up at least know why...
kickstart
10:29 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
Figures...LKB has to look it up in a dictionary. Do these anti's actually knew what they were protesting or are they just parrots for the misinformation they are being fed? Rhetorical question.
Marcus Max
10:34 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
a magazine clip is OBVIOUSLY a clip that holds 2 magazines together...duh
Nathan Ale
2:43 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
LKB you kinda made yourself look stupid no offense..No one is trying to ban " reduced magazine clips ". If there was a PICTURE with that Merriam Webster article you would understand. "stripper Clips" are the clips the dictionary is refering to.. its what you can use to try and LOAD a magazine... or load your gun. Mosin Nagant Rifles are always more easily loaded with Stripper clips.
You aren't fooling anyone.. you have no idea what you are talking about. You want to ban "high capacity magazines" yeah we are fighting that.. and further federal assault weapons bans.. we are against that. We are FOR CCW for all NJersians.. you are against that..
Now you have had your lesson.
second amendment
6:28 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
Congratulations to the NJ2AS supporters for braving the cold and helping to defend our 2nd amendment constitutional rights.
Dee
6:52 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
I want to Thank Everyone who showed up to protect the 2nd amendment rights. We need to educate the public in how utterly idiotic these new bills are..
LKB
7:46 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
Dee were you the lady you actually brought her preschooler in the stroller today in support of the lovely crowd of NJ2AS people? What's next, are you going to put a gun in that child's hand too?
Marcus Max
10:43 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
LKB, wanna be MORE obnoxious? Just because people's opinions differ from yours doesn't mean they don't have the right to bring their kids.
Dee
2:41 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
LKB ... I beg your pardon? You NASTY WOMAN.. I wasn't Even There.. I don't OWN A firearm or even have an FID...BUT I DO UNDERSTAND MY constitution... and when you let the government run over peoples RIGHTS you might as well not have any. YOUR ignorance is appalling. JUST attacking me is quiet childish don't you think? Is this how mature woman behaves? is this how you teach your children to attack someone who had nothing to do with you..Seems you have some growing up to do lady. ( and I will use that term loosely)
Law Abiding Citizen Against Criminals
6:52 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
Very well said "LC" the members of NJ2AS have been very polite. You can not expect society to improve if people don't comprehend the firearm's owners who have passed background checks are not the one's committing crimes.
LKB
7:46 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
If being polite is yelling at peaceful person while spitting on them "I hope you're raped in the street and have no way to protect yourself" I'd have to wonder how you were raised to think that was a polite comment.
mb
7:46 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
I don't understand -- if you have passed a background check, why do you have a problem with everyone being subject to the same background check? The focus is absolutely on gangs and criminals, why leave a huge loophole for them to stockpile weapons and not be subject to a universal background check.
SDJ
8:21 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
@ mb - everyone in NJ has to pass a universal background check already. You also have to fill out a form that allows them to do a thorough mental health check . It is a HIPPA release. It takes about 6 weeks for the police department in your town to do that check. They check with all of the counties you have resided in the last 10 years. You have to get fingerprinted by the NJ State Police. You have to do an additional background and mental health check for EVERY handgun you purchase. A private seller can not , in NJ , sell you a firearm unless you have the forms to show you have gone though these checks ( an FID card and a pistol permit) . It is true other states do not do these things , but WE DO. Adding additional legislation was not necessary. Legislators are doing it anyway as a knee jerk reaction. It is money and time needlessly spent on feel good actions , covering issues that we have already covered with existing laws. . If you don't beleive any of that , go to your local PD and go through the process yourself.
mb
10:29 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
SDJ -- sounds like a thorough process. Is the argument here that it shouldn't be this comprehensive?
The comment I was responding to was "if people don't comprehend the firearm's owners who have passed background checks are not the ones committing crimes," -- wouldn't law abiding gun owners expect that everybody should be held to the same high standards they are? If you were a criminal, should society make it easy for you to acquire guns while we hold law-abiding citizens to a higher standard?
Nathan Ale
2:43 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
@ mb No Mb even though we dislike the current laws on background checks and mental health checks. We compromise and live with them.. Firearm Registration can lead to confiscation such as it is in Ca right now or NY right now... You don't care because you choose not to excersise your 2nd Amendment rights, or privacy of that right.. its ok we will defend yours all the same.
Luke
6:59 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
I think we should have a ban on how many tabloid magazines people read. They cause more damage then law abiding assault weapons owners.
LKB
7:46 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
Luke, that's a dopey comment. Really that's the best you have to contribute.
HL
10:58 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013
mb , "If you were a criminal, should society make it easy for you to acquire guns while we hold law-abiding citizens to a higher standard?" poitn being they are criminals, they dont follow laws....law abiding follow them as they do now--- already 22000 laws on the books nationally---- obviously criminals arent obeying----- stop the plea bargaining and deal making send them all to jail, --all this does it make it harder for sane law abiding people
Jay
6:59 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
excellent support for Congressman Lance's pro 2A stance!!!
LKB
7:46 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
Just incase the majority of you don't read, Lance is coming to the other side...the sensible side. That's right, probably he'll be voting on universal background checks and closing gun show loopholes - that's right, better start stockpiling your illegal guns now.
SDJ
8:35 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
you do know gun shows are already outlawed in NJ , right? And that we already do a universal background check in NJ including a mental health treatment history check that you have to give a privacy release for , right? Other states do not , but we do. The sad part is the legislators are getting away with rewording the same laws we already have to placate the non firearms owners in NJ who do not realize we ALREADY have all these laws that other states are crying out for. What a waste of time , money , and people's emotions.
Dee
2:41 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
ignorance is showing.... if you only knew what LAWS we have already in the state and really what they will be voting on. Stay off the attack mode and ask a few questions.
Karen Egert
7:46 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
Putting FEAR into people about some made up idea of taking away anyone's second amendment is the biggest bunch of nonsense
Where does it stop. ? At rocket launchers ? Do you want that too ?
There are REASOBABLE limits to ALL rights . You can't yell fire in a crowded building. You can't openly attempt to assassinate the president of United States . Thats a class D felony
If you think a federal ban on assault weapons is a violation of your Second Amendment rights , then why dont you take the case to the Supreme Court? There's a ban on assaultvweapons in New Jersey. Take it to the Supreme Court. Guess what ? If you did you'd lose
Do you think if the NRA had any chance in hell that they would win a Supreme Court case if they took the New Jersey assault weapons ban to the Supreme Court , dont you think they would've by now?
They havent because they know they would lose so they spend their time brainwashing people like you with nonsense
Marcus Max
10:43 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
case is already pending in NY, so much for the theory that they dont bring it b/c they know it would lose...
RMB
2:41 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
"Where does it stop. ? At rocket launchers ? Do you want that too ? "
How about this: If the police can have it, the People can have it. Fair enough?
"There are REASOBABLE limits to ALL rights . You can't yell fire in a crowded building."
You are right, but that is an example of prohibited behavior. We don't take away a person's right to speak. We don't gag people because we think they might yell fire. But, in NJ, possession of a firearm outside of very narrow exemptions is a felony. It is the right to possess and carry that is punished, not the illegal behavior of committing a crime with a gun.
If you want to have time place and manner restrictions, that's fine, as long as there is a mechanism to be able to carry for self-defense. For example, if you want to say that you can't carry a rifle in public, that may be permissible if the People can carry a concealed handgun. When you ban possession in public of any firearm, you have engaged in prior restraint and have infringed upon the core right of self-defense protected by the Second Amendment. You go too far.
Brett
3:08 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
Who said anything about rocket launchers? You say "Where does it stop?" I have the same question.
First it was a purchaser's ID card with fingerprinting. No problem.
Then it was this and that gun are illegal, as well as a 15 round magazine max in the NJ AWB. Eh, not a big fan but OK.
Then it was one gun a month. Inconvenient but whatever.
Now 10 round magazines, passing a class before applying for my ID, making me renew and pay for a ID every 5 years, and allowing social workers & marriage counselors to have my firearms seized without due process.
Pending legislation in NJ includes, among other things, a mandatory in-home inspection, a required doctor's note to exercise my God given right, a further magazine reduction to 7 rounds, and a requirement to keep my firearms unloaded inoperable AND locked at all times in my home.
So I ask you again, "where does it stop?" I'll answer my own question. It stops here. Now. Enough. Pass laws that establish strict mandatory sentences for crimes involving firearms. Non-negotiable, no plea agreement, no early release, weapon sentence runs consecutively, do not pass go, go not collect $200. That law targets the thug who avoided the background checks by purchasing a trafficked firearm out of a trunk, not the person who got fingerprinted and checked up on before being allowed the "privilege" of gun ownership by the all powerful State of NJ.
We aren't criminals because we own guns, as much as some want to make us out to be.
Devilsfan
7:47 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
Karen you don't even know what NJ allows and disallows. I see why you don't believe in God as he forgot to give you brains or you would have researched that a NJ resident can purchase a legal AR-15. So there's no reason for the NRA to take it to the Supreme court nor is there any new federal law to take to the Supreme Court. Stop acting on your emotions and understand the issue!
I'm still waiting for your position on Abortion the true killer of millions of children if you really care about the children and saving lives.
Viviane Levy
7:46 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
I think that today's Unity Protest, organized by NJ Residents for Action against Gun Violence was quite successful. This grass root organization was just created six weeks ago, and one could see the fervor and enthusiasm that was reflected by this group. We stand for "common sense gun laws, plain and simple". We do believe in the 2nd Amendment and do not wish to annul it, as some of the Pro-NRA gentlemen who showed up keep on claiming through their signs. We believe that men and women have the right to bear arms to practice target shooting and to hunt, but one does not need an Assault weapon with more than 10 clips to kill a deer! nor to fight a potential intruder.
As far as LC words"I was there in support of Congressman Lance's pro 2A stance, well...how do you know what his position is? He has publicly refused to reveal it...Ooops! I forgot, he does have an A- rating from the NRA.
In any case, NJ Residents for Action against gun violence sincerely hope that Cong. Lance will finally decide to divulge his "conscience", as 70% of his constituents (Fairleigh Dickinson Poll) do believe in common sense gun laws.
DC
2:43 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
I have a simple question, how do you know someone won't need 10 rounds to defend themselves? If three intruders with illegal 9mm pistols with illegal 19 round Magazines broke into my house, who's right is it to tell me how many round magazines I can use to defend my family?? Criminals don't care about laws...How many drugs are illegal..? and you can probably go down to your local schoolyard and buy some...
Law Abiding Citizen Against Criminals
2:41 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
1. Exactly what do you mean by 10 clips to kill a deer? How do you kill a deer with a clip?
2. How many bullets protects you from 3 home intruders and you can only move around if your in a wheelchair?
3. How many criminals have applied for a Firearm's Purchaser Identification Card and bought a gun?
LC
9:50 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
Viviane Levy - I know Lance's stance because I know his voting record, his NRA rating, AND - the night before your "successful" rally that you all abandoned after an hour - I attended a Town Hall in Phillipsburg where Lance stated emphatically that he is a strong believer in the Second Amendment and that we need to focus on the criminals, family values, and mental health - and that does NOT mean mental health of FID holders, as we already sign away much of our right to privacy during the application process. It means mental health of society at large - including you and your children. Thus, Lance "divulged his conscience" quite completely - so much for your Fairly Ridiculous poll.
HL
7:46 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
seems NJ Residents for Action Against Gun Violence are not a local organization but rather a faction of the national Moveon.Org, with ties to Americans For Responsible Solutions and Demand a Plan, and Mayors Against Illegal Guns. That being said can someone from any of these groups please explain how any one of the proposed new bills for NJ will actually safe a life, or reduce gun violence............
mb
10:29 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
Universal background checks need to be universal. Strict gun control laws have little meaning if you can cross the border to a nearby states and purchase whatever guns you please. That's the discussion, not just New Jersey. The background checks we have now have prevented over a million applicants from acquiring guns and that's with the huge loopholes we have now. This very minimal restriction needs to be tightened to make sure the wrong people are not able to get their hands on huge amounts of weaponry.
Russ H
2:41 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
For those who like facts... If an NJ resident attempts to buy a gun "next door" in PA or across the country in TX, the retailer still requires ID. When you show an NJ ID, one of two things will happen... either they tell you they can't sell you to (retailer policy) or they require you to produce your NJ issued Firearms Purchase ID.
Brett
3:26 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
You can't go to PA and legally buy a firearm there without having it shipped to a NJ gun dealer who is federal licensed. That dealer ensures it is either NJ compliant or permanently modifies it to be. Then they check your NJ Driver's License, NJ Firearm's Purchaser's ID, and Permit to Purchase a Handgun. The latter two require a background check, mental health records check, fingerprinting, and two references, among other things.
After those check out, the dealer runs an additional NICS background check on you, per federal law. Once that is complete they register the gun (if a handgun) in your name and give you possession.
Private sales require a Permit to Purchase a Handgun and/or a Firearm's Purchaser's ID depending on the type of firearm. That means, as stated above, a background check, mental health records check, fingerprinting, and two references, among other things. There are no gun show's in NJ, so there goes the gun show loophole. Gun shows held out of state won't allow you to buy anything unless you have a DL from that state.
Recap: NJ has... a background check on all firearm sales, no "gun show loophole", no gun shows, an AWB, and handgun registration.
Educate yourself on the facts before regurgitating the talking points you hear from FOX/CNN/NBC/et all.
LC
9:52 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
Yup - they hide who is really backing them and accuse us of being funded by the NRA. That's what they said when hundreds of us showed up last week in Trenton.
Marla Parker
7:46 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
LC! You cannot talk about your freedoms without considering mine. I want the freedom to go to a movie theatre, church, or school without being murdered. The status quo is not ok, and sorry, but you need to give a little because I have rights too. And don't tell me the 2A says, " go do whatever you want with your guns". Don't even! MP
LC
10:29 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
It seems to me you have exercised your "right" to go to all those places without being murdered because you are still here, spewing your emotional, idiotic drivel. Have you heard a single pro 2A person say the amendment says "go do what you want?" I haven't. The fact is, we have some of the most restrictive laws on the books here - and guess what? Gun laws don't work because criminals commit the crimes and criminals don't care about gun laws. Even Corey Booker, a D from one of the most crime ridden cities, said gun laws are not the answer - of the hundreds of gun crimes in Newark last year, ONE was committed with a registered gun.
kickstart
10:34 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
and to that point, if more laws are passed will the criminals (those are the ones that don't obey laws) follow them? Using your logic, with over one million legal gun owners in New Jersey, we should have all been harmed by now.
James Kaleda
2:41 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
Marla you do have the freedom to go to a movie theatre, church, or school without being murdered.
And it is your responsibility to protect that right, that is to protect your life. That right is currently infringed by NJ laws. NJ laws restrict your ability to defend yourself, &the proposed bills will restrict your ability and your right to protect your self &your family even further.
The police can not help you protect your life. They can only intervene after a crime has been committed. The supreme court has ruled they have no obligation to help you , &in NJ if the police fail to come to your aid it is against the law for you to sue them.
Legislation can not help protect your life, either as evidenced by the fact that murder is still committed in-spite of it being illegal. If an individual is willing to violate a law banning murder, they will have no problem violating a law that says they can not own a certain type of firearm.
Making something illegal doesn't make it go away it only restricts the ability of those who are inclined to follow the law. Banning drugs didn't make them go away, banning counterfeit merchandise doesn't make it go away, banning guns (or any type of guns) won't make them go away. Since criminals don't follow laws, gun control serves only to make easy targets
As Franklin said "those who would sacrifice freedom for security will have neither"
SDJ
7:46 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
I doubt the people protesting for "action" in NJ know we already have an extended mental health background check system in NJ, or that of the 269 gun related murders ONE was committed by a person with a rifle ( FBI 2011 stats ), that 15 round is STANDARD for a magazine , not high capacity..we already have a high capacity ban. 15 rounds is standard for smaller caliber pistols most likely to be the firearm of choice for home defense for WOMEN . I doubt they know they are calling to close a loophole that does.not.exist in NJ..you can't buy face to face in NJ without an FID card for long guns and a pistol permit for handguns..you have to go through a background check for all of those cards and permits . WE DO NOT HAVE GUN SHOWS IN NJ anyway. We do not have a rifle problem in NJ , we do not have high capacity magazine problem in NJ , we do not have any loopholes in NJ. We have an illegal handgun problem .The people caught committing crimes with these illegal handguns are back out after making bail and never spend more than a few months in prison in any event. To the people who were protesting for action - if you want to save lives hold the politicians feet to the fire in requesting more thorough enforcement and sentences that STICK for those who break the already very strict gun laws we DO have. You'll make no dent in the death rate wasting your energy trying to put further restrictions on the people who intend on following the law. We are already solid on all the other laws.
Viviane Levy
8:16 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
SDJ by saying "hold the politicians feet to the fire in requesting more thorough enforcement" is exactly what we did by demonstrating in front of our Congressman, in District #7. He will go back to Washington and be part of the Federal actions to
pass Federal laws against gun violence - that's exactly our point! We want him to take a stand. When people can go to Pennsylvania (where gun laws are not very strict), buy an Assault weapon, then cross to N.J. and go to a restaurant, a school or a shopping, and start a massacre, I am quite anxious and concerned! I am glad you are a law abiding citizen...incidentally, did all of you guys from the NRA live in District # 7? I wonder!!!
SDJ
10:29 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
NJ residents can't cross to other states and buy assault weapons.Crossing state lines after making a face to face private purchase is already against federal law.If you buy from a gun store in another state they have to verify you have passed the NJ requirements by checking your FID card and your license , then you have to fill out a certificate of eligibility that they must keep on file.The store has to make sure the gun you are buying in NJ compliant.Handguns have to ship to NJ , you can't leave an out of state store with them .They have to ship to an FFL in NJ , that becomes the point of sale where the legal NJ gun owner has to produce his pistol permit and FID card.For NJ residents , the universal background check is ALWAYS in play even out of state.Understand ,legal NJ gun owners want the same thing you do. Safety.Being familiar with firearms makes you more knowledgeable of the existing laws , more knowledgeable of how the firearms work ( assault weapons can be converted into non assault weapons by switching to a wood stock , their lethality will not be altered , just their cosmetic appearance . Scout's honor) . When we try to dispel media myths and misconceptions we are met with closed ears and resistance. Too bad we can't all learn from each other. If we were on the same side we could force the politicians to enforce these laws we already have. All they want is more bills that have "passed" added to their resume , regardless of whether it translates into lower crime.
Russ H
2:41 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
Great post, SDJ. My wish is that just one of the uninformed folks in this thread would acknowledge that he/she learned something from it. The ignorance of the "go next door to PA" argument is tiresome.
Greg Z
7:48 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
The media & THIS administration are using these Tragedies to gather public support to push their agenda. They are USING the people from move-on by distorting the truth. My advise is to them is check the facts. Especially before you let others take advantage of you to push THEIR agenda. Start with looking up Colorado Hunting Regulations and you will find the .223 used in the Aurora Tragedy is PROHIBITED for deer hunting. It is a very small caliber. It is considered inadequate for taking game smaller than coyotes and rabbits. These are Colorado Rules & Regualtions. The Police prefer to use the SMALL caliber .223 in case they miss their target. The chances of penetrating a wall and hitting a law-abiding citizen in the next room are reduced. The Police use the BLACK rifle as a physiologial deterent for crowd control. The bark is much louder than it's bite. The ammo is very lightweight. If you fall for this than a black car should be considered an Assualt Vehicle and banned from the public. Think before you let george soros known as the financial terrorist of the world & founder of IANSA USE you as sheep to disarm America. He also supports Move-on. The shooter in Aurora was considered "brillant." Smart enough to be a brain surgeon. Say there were NO guns in the world. Would he have been a different person? Would you want him to conduct surgery on anyone you loved? This is NOT about guns. This is about dismantling the Constitution. This is a DIRECT attack on YOUR GOD-Given Rights.
Greg Z
8:16 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
Notice how this administration will place NO blame on gangs, illegals or criminals?
They are looking for soft states like NJ, NY and CA to push their agenda.
I don't recall any small print in the Bill of Rights that exempt NJ, NY or CA. Hmmm???
Not one of these 43 Bills will reduce crime.
They will only place more restrictions on the good law-abiding citizens in NJ.
Their intent is to divide and conquer.
This is NOT a gun problem.
This is a society problem.
And these elected officals who FAILED as leaders in their community and the nation are using gun control to distract your attention from placing blame on them for avoiding to address the real problems in society and those who cause them.
Crimials do NOT comply with the law.
Now our elected officals are FAILING to comply with the Law.
They were sworn-in to Protect and Defend the Constitution they took an OATH to UPHOLD. It is an IMPEACHABLE offense to circumvent against the Constitution INCLUDING the Second Amendment which is the one God-Given Individual Rights that protects ALL the rest including YOUR First Admendment Right - Freedom of Speech.
Luke
8:16 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
LKB you obviously have too much time on your hands. Guns are safe and made to be safe. It is those who havent been educated about them or have acquired them illegally that make them unsafe. Who are you to take away someones right to own what they want especially when they are law abiding and have been utilizing their rights and liberties. Millions have died fighting for our rights and liberties. I have taken an oath to uphold the constitution and served for 9 years including a year in a combat zone. What have have you done? I am educated and frankly am offended that you think its the uneducated that see this proposal as wrong. Just because Oprah says to fight it doesnt mean its right. By the way ever hear the saying those who yell the loudest fall the hardest. Cant wait to all those like you fall and fail.
LC
10:29 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
Thank you for your service. I often think of the military members who've put themselves in harm's way and of those who have made the ultimate sacrifice for love of country. It's very painful to watch the liberties you fought so hard to protect be decimated by this administration and those who believe in its dogma.
HL
8:35 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
Do you people even have a clue what the current laws in NJ are?????? NJ is rated A- by the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence .....http://smartgunlaws.org/new-jersey-state-law-summary/ educate yourselves! There is not a single proposal on the table that will stop a crazy from shooting you in the movies or walking down the street as someone up there mentioned.......wake up---prosecute the offenders, take away their rights, they deserve no less...... do something about the out of control mental health status of this country, stop putting bandaids on real problems and start taking real steps towards correction...and by the way EVIL is a fact of life, you will bever rid the world of it, so why try to rid the world of the ability to PROTECT oneself from it should the need occur!
Marci Bandelli
8:35 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
So let me get this straight, the responsible gun owners who passed background checks and responsibly lock up their weapons so their children don't shoot each other, who felt the need to show up today at the NJResidents for Action against gun violence came to oppose federal background checks and gun show loop holes? Isn't that considered an oxymoron. Do you people even know what you are not fighting for? Instead of fighting us, all you responsible gun owners should be outraged by the abuses that irresponsible gun owners exhibit each and every day. Everyone there today knows this has nothing to do with your second amendment right and every thing to do with PUBLIC SAFETY because my kids are more important than your assault weapons and irresponsible gun owners. Start looking at your own organization before you disrupt someone else. Its called "looking in the mirror".
LC
10:51 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
Marci - we are as outraged by violent crime as you. Actually, we are more outraged than you because people like you look at gun crime an associate all gun owners with it. We are not fighting YOU. We want prosecutors and judges to deal more severely with criminals - stop letting violent criminals back on the street. We are parents, grandparents, sisters, brothers, husbands, wives - we are affected by violence in society, too. How dare you make such a disgusting statement: you r children are more important than our assault weapons? When is the last time you heard of a legally registered "assault weapon" being used in a crime? I'll wait. This is not a rhetorical question.
By the way - we have as much right to the sidewalk as you do. I find it interesting that your 3 hour protest ended after an hour. I understand you didn't expect us and weren't happy about it. But for your members to lie and say we were foul mouthed and wished rape upon you is deplorable. One of our attendees was a mom and your friend RKB berated her (above) in a disgraceful manner. She believes in the Constitution and cares about the country her little son will live in. I think it's very sad and pathetic that you think it's not about the Constitution.
James Kaleda
2:41 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
what you seem to be missing MarciB is that while the idea of "Supporting common sense gun laws" is admirable, it is not what you are doing.
None of the proposed bills will do anything to reduce crime. they will not "save even one life"
But they will restrict the rights of law abiding citizens.
The groups and individuals that wrote the proposed assault weapons ban (awb) know there is no such thing. "assault weapon" is a term made up by an anti-gun lobbyist. it doesn't refer to any specific group of weapons, and the firearms it refers to under its current definition are no more dangerous than the ones it doesn't refer to. These groups have all said publicly that they want to ban all firearms and an AWB is part of their current strategy to do so.
Once the awb is in place they change the definition of assault weapon until all weapons are included. they have already started to do this as they have included more conditions in this bill than the last AWB. NJ does it also, 1st they banned .60 caliber weapons, now they are trying to ban .50 caliber firearms. (no murders have been committed with either mind you)
So you see we are not resisting "common sense gun laws" we are resisting laws that make no sense. As soon as someone proposes a piece of firearms legislation that will reduce crime we will support it!
For instance we support CCW laws and if you want to reduce crime you should too
Karen Egert
10:29 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
FOR THE THOUSANDTH TIME WE ARE TALKING ABOUT FEDERAL ASSAULT BAN , FEDERAL ASSAULT BAN , FEDERAL FEDERAL FEDERAL
WHY ??????????
So people can't go to PA OR VA and buy these weapons and come to NJ AND EXECUTE MY CHILDREN !!!!!!!!!
Listen to What we are saying !!!!!!!!
It's like takjjng to a WALL with some of you PEOPLE
The poor STUDENTS executed at VA were killed by weapons bought at a gun show in VA WITH NO BACKGROUND CHECK.!!! Get it through your THICK HEADS . We are not taking AWAY your freukin GUNS!!!
DO PEOPLE IN THIS COUNTRY AS CIVILIANS NEED TO OWN THE WEAPONS THEY USE IN AFGHANISTAN FOR GOD SAKE?
LC
2:43 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
Wow Karen - YOU seem to need the psychological evaluation your signs today called for. Who is being executed in NJ by the weapons used in Afghanistan? Who is selling automatic weapons? Really - I want to know. I know it's not NJ FID holders. Do you know the difference between a military STYLE semi and a fully automatic? Hmm?
Nathan Ale
2:41 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
Karen not only are you wrong but I really don't you have any idea what you are talking about. First of all.. the standard weapon lets just say in Afghanistan is lets say an AK47 which is illegal in NJ. Thiers is also Fully automatic, a TRUE assault weapon. They are illegal here to.
In no military in the world do they use AR15, they are not the same as an M16 or an M4 but you can believe whatever you want.
As far as Virgina? I assume your talking about the Virginia Tech Shootings? They were perpitrated with a handgun, and a bunch of 10 round magazines. You do realize no current legislation that is even BEING considered would hinder that kind of action at all.. No we are talking about "Semi-automatic rifles"
Second of all in all of history only 1 time has an individual take a rifle like Lanza did and shoot kids like he did, at no other point has this occured. So your individual fear of someone going to VA and "aquiring a weapon and murdering your children" is not only unfounded its wrong.
I would worry more about your children dying in a car accident where drunk driving is concerned.. in all of 2011 Im estimating 350 individuals were murdered in the US with rifles, and that is ANY kind of rifle. Pistols killed 8000, and Drunk Driving killed 22,000.
This is the part where logic demolishes your argument. Get educated.
RHUTCH
2:41 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
Karen, What makes you think they can't execute your children with some diesel fuel, fertilizer, and a box truck. How many children were killed in Oklahoma City? You don't see them items banned! Or the right person might use a knife! Or a automobile. BTW Karen what is an assault weapon? What does it look like, how big of a caliber bullet is used?
Take a look at this video, done by a law officer in California, maybe you will a little about what an assault weapon is: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ysf8x477c30
James Kaleda
2:41 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
well the issue is you ARE taking our guns. Just saying "we are not taking your guns" doesn't mean you are not. It may not be your intent but, it will be the outcome of the proposed bills.
You are obviously not a firearms owner so when the law passes you go away and we are stuck with a poorly written, poorly executed restriction on our freedoms that doesn't reduce crime. it has happened 22,000 times in this country. Thats how many anti-gunowner laws we have, every single one was promoted by blood dancing politicians and well meaning moms as being common sense restrictions to reduce violence.
I understand the frustration that comes from trying to get seemingly intelligent people to accept a basic, obvious, and logical premise.
We resist a federal ban because there is no such thing as Assault weapons, it is a ruse to ban all firearms. I know I know "they"told you "I" was going to say that & "they" told you it wasn't true .. but it is true. Hey your not into guns, so you don't know guns & thats ok. If you had a working knowledge of firearms you would see that an AWB is an all out gun grab and nothing more.
BTW those guns they use in Afghanistan are already banned in the United States.
What we are trying to hold onto here are the firearms we use for defense, of ourselves, our families, and against tyranny. and those are the same weapons included in the proposed AWB
Brett
3:38 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
Try again Karen, the VA Tech shooter legally purchased those weapons and passed a background check due to VA's lack of submitting mental health records to the federal system.
"During February and March 2007, Cho began purchasing the weapons that he later used during the killings. On February 9, 2007, Cho purchased his first handgun, a .22 caliber Walther P22 semi-automatic pistol, from TGSCOM Inc., a federally licensed firearms dealer based in Green Bay, Wisconsin and the operator of the website through which Cho ordered the gun. TGSCOM Inc. shipped the Walther P22 to JND Pawnbrokers in Blacksburg, Virginia, where Cho completed the legally required background check for the purchase transaction and took possession of the handgun. Cho bought a second handgun, a 9mm Glock 19 semiautomatic pistol, on March 13, 2007 from Roanoke Firearms, a licensed gun dealer located in Roanoke, Virginia. Cho was able to pass both background checks and successfully complete both handgun purchases after he presented to the gun dealers his U.S. permanent residency card, his Virginia driver's permit to prove legal age and length of Virginia residence and a checkbook showing his Virginia address, in addition to waiting the required 30-day period between each gun purchase. He was successful at completing both handgun purchases because he did not disclose on the background questionnaire that a Virginia court had ordered him to undergo outpatient treatment at a mental health facility."
Mike E
12:18 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
Ban BOX CUTTERS !
More people died in a single day because CRIMINALS used BOX CUTTERS than all the tragic mass shootings of this century combined.
After that - everyone seemed ok with ARMED Air Marshals.
Do we ban all tools because they can fall into the hands of evil ??
HL
1:43 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
Federal will never pass they don't have the votes, the power to pass this nonsense belongs to the soft states, why do you think the powers behind you are pushing states like NJ and NY to enact this garbage? From there all these feel good band-aids will go to the Supreme Court... why not address the real issues ??? --- for every incident where a nut or criminal used a gun and I can site 10 where guns saved more lives than those lost--- why are you all hell bent on criminalizing normal everyday people?...since this nonsense started more guns have been bought by those that never would have considered having one than ever, to what do you attribute that fact? Again educate yourself, semi- automatics are not the same as automatics..... How close to your home is the nearest police officer? I am willing to take you to a range or sit down and talk sense any time, Karen just let me know...... In the meantime I am taking my scary looking semi-automatic black gun out back to blast some targets. Why? Because I can, its my right. And yes practice is part of responsibility---- do I need government to tell me how much and when to do so? NO, not unless they are paying the bill! All sensible people know for themselves how much they need. We are grown up adults, I personally am sick of people acting like we're mindless uncaring children who need the government to tell us how to think, feel and eat.Punish the Offenders, please do-- Heal the sick, please do!!! Other than that stop infringing!
S_O_G
4:32 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013
so why were people from your group harassing the LOCAL, LOCAL, LOCAL mayor at home about this?
Greg Z
8:52 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013
Karen, The person RESPONSIBLE for the VA tech Tragedy purchased that gun LEGALLY although the school that chose to be politically correct $$$ FAILED to address his KNOWN psychological problems. He was also an ALIEN student in OUR country. Who should NOT be entitled to OUR Constitutional 2A Rights unless they go through the process required to become a LEGAL Law-Abiding citizen. IMO
That school also VOTED in previous months to be a "GUN FREE ZONE."
Feel free to check the facts before you write comments based on emotions.
FYI - A NJ resident can NOT buy a fiream in PA WITHOUT going through a mandatory background check to get a NJ Firearms I.D. card. Which requires 3 sets of fingerprints submitted to the FBI, SBI & Local Police. Then entered into a NATIONAL Data Base. Including 2 personal references and 1 from your employer which MUST be returned to your local Police Dept.
Then you MUST pass a additonal NICS check at the FFL (FEDERAL firearms LICENSD) dealer in ALL 50 states to buy the LEGAL firearm.
REMEMBER the Fingerprints that were enetered into a NATIONAL Data Base?
N = NATIONAL (ALL 50 States)
I = INSTANT
C = CRIMINAL
S = SYSTEM
This administration will place NO blame on criminals, gangs or illegals.
This is NOT about guns.
This is about dismantling the Constitution and a direct ATTACK on Individual Rights.
I though jobs were the # 1 priority in America?
This is a distraction because they FAILED as leaders to deliver their promise.
HL
10:29 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
1st off there are no gun shows in NJ due to current laws, 2nd ly We are outraged at the abuses, hence why we are demanding as you call it "common sense" solutions. It has as much to do with to do with rights as safety--- take one away and then the next the next and the next...if its really about lives then lets start being sensible and think about the revolving doors that criminals go through with a slap on the wrist rather than being punished for their crimes to the fullest extent of the law, You think we dont have kids or care about our kids???? My son was at VA Tech both times along with my daughter in law, my granddaughter the 2nd time....guess what 1st time no armed guards, 2nd time armed guards with what amounts to pea shooters, there wont be a 3rd time - the guards are no longer in plain sight and are carrying guns we cant afford to have.......... your version of how to be safe and secure and that of others differs so be it, you dont want guns dont buy them, dont use them...when you get attacked and the police are 20 minutes away and you have no way to call them, then what? I prefer to be secure my way and it is my right...you prefer you way and it is your right........again are you familiar with NJ gun law as it is today?????
HL
10:29 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
oh and right no one should have showed up to counter your attacks on the rights of Americans because your will and thoughts are the only ones, what you think everyone should think, please....stop the NONSENSE!!!!!
Greg Z
10:29 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
I hear people ask:
why does anyone need more than one gun or a magazine with more than 10 rounds.
I ask EVERY one of you to ask yourself this simple question:
Why does anyone need a car in America that EXCEEDS the legal speed limit?
There is ABSOLUTELY NO reason to own or operate a car that exceeds the legal speed limit in America or NJ.
How many of you have children who own a car or motorcycle that can EXCEED -- double -- the legal speed limit?
There is NO reason your children should own or operate a vehicle that EXCEEDS double the legal speed limit.
Give me 1 reason....
Then if and maybe then you will have the answer to your own question.
ALL vehicles that EXCEED the legal speed limit MUST be banned.
"If it only saves 1 life"
Aman77
10:29 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
Question for the NJ Residents For Action: For years now little minority boys and girls from Newark to Washington DC to Chicago to Oakland have been getting shot to pieces BY HANDGUNS yet you never showed the slightest concern. Why is it that you so-called "color-blind" lefties only seem stirred to action when it's little white kids that get killed? Do you see little Brittany or Aidan's life as somehow more valuable than Juanita's or Julio's, Maliyah's or DeShawn's? How many young minorities have been shot since Newtown, yet all Karen Egert talks about (always in CAPS) are the innocents of Newtown. I guess in her liberal land of faux compassion, it's only worth getting off one's butt to organize a half-hour protest or fire off a few blogs when white kids are the victims. Hey, but remember, the Tea Partiers are the racists right? Oh, and why are you not in Camden where gun crimes actually happen on a regular basis instead of Westfield? How brave of you.
Marc
2:41 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
^ Excellent point! ^
Law Abiding Citizen Against Criminals
10:29 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
Irresposible are those who let criminals walk free on a plea bargan, irresponsible are those who do not comply with laws, irresponsible are those who think criminal minded people do follow laws, irresponsible are those who allow their consitutionAl rights to be infringed upon, irresponsible are those who ignore gangs and criminal behavior, irresponsible are those who do not act as a role model for their children, irresponsible are those who do not get involved in their communities
Karen Egert
10:29 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
Dear HL,
Are you NOT listening , or just can't listen. Use your common sense. If you can buy an assault weapon soooo easily in PA you're damn straight someone can come into any movie theater in NJ.
Besides, what kind of country do you want to live in? Where owning an assault rifle trumps the POSSIBILITY OF SAVING LIVES?? WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE??
Greg Z
2:43 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
When is the last time you bought a firearm in PA?
Have you ever tried this???
I don't care what you read. You can NOT buy a firearm in PA without a NJ Firearms I.D. card and PASSING a NICS (background check).
Give it try....
Let me know how it works out for you.
You have NO clue what your talking about.
Marc
2:41 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
Karen, the point some of us here are trying to make is, we're just not exactly sure what or whose lives you think you will be saving by banning an inanimate object?
36,000 people died in motor vehicle accidents last year.
323, yes 323 people were killed by rifles (that includes ANY and EVERY type of rifle by they way) in 2011.
And with all due respect, the concept and principles behind owning that rifle (it IS a rifle, NOT an "assault rifle" which is a term "invented" or made up by some politicians and the liberal media simply to drive home a particular agenda) are FAR BIGGER than you're giving it credit for.
That rifle sends a very important message to enemies both foreign and domestic.
You may not understand it or grasp it right now but that rifle in your neighbor's home actually helps keep YOU AND YOUR FAMILY SAFE inadvertently.
"How so" you may ask?
Well this is how...the person looking to invade your home DOES NOT KNOW who does or does not have that home protection so they think twice about entering/burglarizing. Yes some choose to enter anyway of course because they are brazen and/or on PCP but that of course is also WHY some of us choose to arm ourselves accordingly.
Paranoid? Overkill?
Perhaps.
But look at it this way...it's like car or homeowner's insurance, we don't have those policies because we WANT or need to use them all of the time, but once they are needed we sure are glad that we have them.
Please try & focus on THE CRIMINAL, not the tools.
Nathan Ale
2:41 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
Karen again let me re-iterate the previously established point. Not over 400 individuals were murdered last year with Rifles of any type. Pistols killed over 8000. Your anger is not only misplaced but un-educated. These are not "assault rifles" they are semi-automatic rifles... if you have a real issue with people dying over guns, campaign over pistols. Atleast that would make sense.
HL
9:27 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
How can you even begin to think anyone can take you hysterics seriously??? Have you read NJ law, are you familiar with Federal law, are you familiar with PA law? Please tell me how all these proposed bans and added regulations will in your mind stop one single nut case or criminal? My children are well adjusted functioning members of society, how dare you people continue to make law abiding citizens any less of a human than those who agree with you???? EDUCATE YOURSELF with facts rather than BS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I I have a daughter who leaves work at 1am into a dark parking lot alone, what is she allowed for protection in the great state of NJ--- a small can of pepper spray and a cell phone, how close is the nearest police officer, how fast can an attacker gain control of her at 5'1 and 100 pounds? What law on the table is going to make her safer???
HL
9:31 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
btw Karen Egert, in my opinion your obvious lack of knowledge and level of hysteria are far more dangerous to society than any inanimate object that could be used as a weapon
Devilsfan
8:20 am on Friday, February 22, 2013
Karen...children are executed everyday by Planned Parenthood. When are you going to lead the charge to ban most Abortions? When Karen? When will you try to stop these executions????
Greg Z
10:29 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
More facts:
For those who fall into bloomberg's trap....
"we need to close the gun show loop-holes"
HOW MANY OF YOU HAVE EVER EVEN BEEN TO A GUN SHOW?
FYI- Gun shows are NO secret.
There are (undercover) ATF agents at EVERY one of them.
The seller is called a FFL dealer.
Federal Firearms LICENSED dealer.
(kind of like a liquor store or car dealer)
In AMERICA we have what is called a NICS (background check)
Notice how bloomberg never points this out???
N = NATIONAL (This means EVERY state)
I = INSTANT
C = Criminal
S = SYSTEM
What bloomberg is using to brainwash the public is like saying:
You can go down south and buy a brand new car from Detroit without a title.
NO Firearm leaves the factory without paperwork.
ALL firearms go to a LICENSED FFL distributer.
ALL firearms then go to a LICENSED FFL dealer.
NO person can buy a firearm with out going through a NICS check.
If a law-abiding person sells to a criminal the firearm paper trail will go back to the original seller and Law-Enforcement WILL hold them accountable.
Kind of like buying a car without a title???
This called a Straw-Purchase which comes with a $10,000 fine and 6 months in jail.
bloomberg is NOT looking for gun show loop-holes.
He is looking for Constitutional loop-holes.
And counts on people like move-on to believe the media without checking the facts.
He's USING YOU to push his agenda.
This is the person who wants to ban what size soft drink you can buy?
Law Abiding Citizen Against Criminals
10:29 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
And just so WE get this straight, "gun free" cities like Chicago and DC dont have the highest murder rates in the country? Guns are not the issue, more laws are not the issue, there is a societal issue that is not being addressed, not one bill being voted on tomorrow addresses criminals. In New Jersey gangs are infested in our schools, why is this not being addressed? Did you know there are over 500 documented gangs statewide? Criminals do not follow laws!
Greg Z
10:18 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013
Looks like our elected officals don't follow the law either.
This administration will place NO blame on criminals, gangs or illegals.
LC
10:29 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
LKB - You looked up "magazine clip" in the dictionary: "According to The Merriam-Webster dictionary now defines a clip as "a device to hold cartridges for charging the magazines of some rifles; also a magazine from which ammunition is fed into the chamber of a firearm." There is no such thing as a "magazine clip" - I don't have to look it up. It is either a clip or a magazine and modern guns do not use clips. Your comments are bizarre. You and your comrades are simply clueless - pathetic.
Nathan Ale
2:41 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
I defeated this individuals points too.. they know not what they speak about. Uneducated individuals should not be using thier emotion to drive thier stupidity.
Law Abiding Citizen Against Criminals
10:29 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
If your a parent shouldn't you be demanding a cop in every school? I had a cop in my middle school and high school, colleges have campus police, is their a cop in your schools or did they get laid off? Is there a cop trained in identifying "gang affiliation" and "drug abuse" in your schools? Why are you not focusing on combatting societal issues that have little or no paper trail like drugs, violence, and gang affiliations? Pretending that is not a core issue in "your" school or "your" town is just plain ignorant.
Ed Smith
10:43 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
Do any of the anti gun crowd even bother looking at what current firearm laws are in this state? We currently have criminal and mental health background checks, waiting periods and numerous other steps that we have to take. Do you even for a minute think any criminal is going to apply for a legal firearm? The gun is obtained illegally stolen, black market. They are not walking into a dealer and making a purchase. If I make the decision to purchase a handgun in this state it will take at least 30 days maybe much longer to do this legally. If I was a criminal I could probably buy 10 illegal guns in an hour any time of day. I realize you want safety in public places like parks and movie theaters but trying to restrict something even further is not going to fix it. You want safety in public places petition the state to allow honest law,abiding citizens to conceal carry a firearm. Currently in NJ we can not do this. Law Enforcment can not be everywhere all the time.That is the only chance of curtailing the decay in our society. A criminal has no concern for your life or mine.
RWW
10:43 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
Dancing on the graves of dead children to push their agenda and make law abiding citizens less safe! These same morons think nothing of killing a baby a week prior to delivery. Sick, sick people!
Marc
2:41 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
And that is EXACTLY what they (and the liberal media/politicians) are all doing, GRANDSTANDING on the graves of dead children.
Correction, on the graves of WHITE SUBURBAN children.
Where's the love for the children of Chicago or Camden?
I don't want to see kids shot either, the thought of it makes me sick actually. :-(
But let's try and be more productive/effective and find a method THAT WORKS towards actually ending it and not focus on some piece of metal/plastic that can cause ABSOLUTELY NO HARM all by itself.
kickstart
10:43 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
We are outraged at senseless tragedies and you will never hear about our side because the media will only vilify and mute us. We always push for harsher sentences for criminals while the politicians and judges on your side push for lower bail and more lenient sentences. But here is the kicker, just like the whole "everybody must pay their fair share" idea, we, the law-abiding, are are criminalized for the actions of felons. We are blamed while we follow the letter of the law. When your politicians and your media talk about the "gun culture" somehow we freedom-loving, target shooting, home-defending, hunting, and, again, law-abiding citizens get lumped into the same category as gang-bangers, convicted felons, car jackers, robbers, rapists, mass-shooters, and murderers. Take away their rights, as it should be, and leave us alone.
That is what we are protesting.
That is what we are protesting.
Greg Z
2:43 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
Funny,
You don't complain about having Police in your banks to protect your money?
Or in a convienence store on the third shift.
Or in Motor Vehicles or the Unemployment Office.
You had one to two Police Officers in your gas stations 24/7 after Hurricane Sandy.
Mainly because NJ is one of only two states in America that don't trust people enough to pump their own gas. You had a shortage of man-power for stations with multiple pumps which created the lines.
But you oppose having a TRAINED PROFFESSIONAL already on the tax-payers salary to PROTECT YOUR Children in your schools?
And you people think you have the answer?
Disarm the public and make it easier for the criminal.
Columbine, Aurora, Newtown and VA ALL Gun-Free Zones and you want more?
OUR Schools who are RESPONSIBLE for OUR Children who are in THEIR care when the parent is NOT there should be able to PROTECT OUR Children from ALL harm including bad politics.
kickstart
2:43 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
Let us first get the dialogue straight here. The term "assault weapon" is a fabricated term, circa 1989, often credited, but not confirmed, from Josh Sugarmann, used to instill fear into the unknowing American people and further propagated by the media. Assault weapons, or machine guns, as many of you would like to believe they are, are and have been banned from public sale for years. Additionally, the so-called "assault weapons" of which you fantasize banning are actually small caliber rifles, not high-powered, large caliber, "weapons of war", nor can they be converted into such. Many of the materials they are constructed of differ in composition, strength, and durability from their military-in-look-only comparisons.
Now for "large-capacity-magazines (or clips as they are mistakenly called). Standard capacity magazines will hold 15, 20, and 30 rounds.
So, before we entertain banning things we know nothing about, it would be prudent to KNOW what it is we're talking about.
Nathan Ale
2:41 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
I am going to leave this conversation understanding that not only do the loudest mouths regarding the Individuals for some kind of action people, whomever they are.. are nothing more than politically motivated sham-artists that know as much about the difference between steel casing vs brass casing, or the difference between 5.56 and 7.62.
You think that a foregrip makes the gun a lethal killing machine.. your stupidity knows NO BOUNDS... do not make the gun culture into bad people for we are not.. we are the educated because we CARE ABOUT OUR RIGHTS. I work in an ER, not on a farm..not in a gun shop. Im finishing my Nursing degree WHAT DO YOU THINK YOU KNOW?
I'll be willing to debate this with any of you.. but know this.. The odds are NOT in your favor, the Facts are NOT in your favor, the Statistics are NOT in your favor... and you will loose.
When logic is dwarfed by emotion and knee jerk reaction your argument finds its Genesis... You will lose.
Marc
4:36 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
^ And that's an important factor, the standard stereotypical 'emotion driven' knee jerk 'ban that type of gun now' reactions when unfortunate tragedies like these happen.
And I'm not necessarily knocking that reaction/behavior as this latest one truly was a horrifying event. I understand why those who aren't very well versed on mental illness, criminology OR firearms might react illogically/irrationally.
The right feelings, but the wrong focus.
When someone hands you PURE FACTUAL DATA/STATISTICS don't 'knee jerk' retort with the classic: "but don't you care about the twenty children/seven adults that were murdered?!" as that is NOT relevant in that particular 'cause and effect' discussion.
And yes, we DO care.
But the firearm itself does NOTHING on it's own unless a HUMAN loads it and pulls the trigger.
Adam Lanza also stole his mother's Honda Civic that day. Had he instead chosen to wait for those kids/teachers to get out of school for the day and assemble in large groups outside waiting for the bus, brought that car up to 50+mph and aimed it just right he could've committed the very same (or worse?) atrocities as that's what sick or criminal minds do. James Holmes could've done the very same in that Colorado movie theater's parking lot.
Would you all then be calling for a ban/limitation on "Assault Hondas"?
Let's start blaming (and trying to fix/prevent/stop) the perpetrators, not the tools that they choose.
Greg Z
2:41 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
So you had Law-Enforcement in your gas stations after Hurricane Sandy.
But you don't want a trained proffesional Police Officer in your schools to protect your children?
The schools should have the ability to protect YOUR children against ALL harm including bad politics.
Marc
2:41 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
Marc
11:35 pm on Wednesday, February 20, 2013
Whenever we see people using phrases like "high capacity clips" and "gun show loopholes" it immediately tells us that they are NOT at all well educated about the very firearms or terminology that they are actually opposing. It's a CLEAR signal that you've spent WAY too much time watching only (inaccurate and misinformed) Piers Morgan episodes and simply quoting Michael Bloomberg or Dianne Feinstein instead of watching some of the more informative You Tube firearms videos that are easily available to you.
It's a MAGAZINE, not a clip. Yes, some classic/older rifles do use something called a 'clip' but those are NOT what you are actually referring to here.
And as others have said, THERE ARE NO GUN SHOWS held in NJ.
Some of you people need to become more educated before you picket and protest about issues involving fellow law abiding citizens' rights and freedoms. You wouldn't want 'middle school dropouts' making major Board of Education decisions in your children's schools. Please afford us that same courtesy before you petition and protest our legislators/senators/congressman to make serious decisions involving that sacred Constitution/Bill of Rights THAT PROTECTS US ALL.
Trust me, we don't want crazed criminals injuring/killing innocent people/children either, but some (most actually) of these ideas/concepts/bills that you're fighting for are not going to help prevent/solve ANY of that.
Greg Z
2:41 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
In Trenton the Police are going door to door asking people to lock their homes and protect themselves against an increasing rapid growing criminal problem.
And you want to take the GOD - Given Individual Right of the people away?
The ability to protect their families, communtiy and country?
And make it easier for the criminals?
None of these anti-gun bills address the problem.
Notice how this administation will place NO blame on criminals, gangs or illegals?
This is their dream act to divide and disarm the people to make them dependent on bigger government.
Never forget:
A governement big enough to give you everything is big enough to take it away.
JFK -- NRA Life Member once said "Although I don't believe we need the Second Amendment to protect US against a tyrannical government. It is a very important Individual Right." The NRA is the oldest CIVIL RIGHTS organization in the nation.
Think about that for a minute?
JFK didn't think we would ever see a tyrannical government in this country again.
But the Founding Father did....
They didn't know when but they knew it would happen.
You are seeing a tyrannical government forming before your very eyes.
That time has returned and Thank GOD our Founding Fathers gave US the tools defend and protect OUR country against ALL enemies foreign & domestic.
BTW, Look up THIS administrations FAILED Operation Fast & Furious that resulted in the death of U.S. Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry. Disgraceful.
Greg Z
2:41 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
If you had any clue you would protect, defend, respect, appreciate and bequeath your Individual God Given Rights and pass them on to your children and grandchildren as the previous generation did for you.
The Bill of Right protects YOUR GOD - Given Rights from a tyrannical government that would like to take them away. And turn you into subjects instead of citizens. Instead of living in a country based on Freedom that believed in giving the power/authority to the citizens because they didn't trust the government. Not only did they give the power to WE THE PEOPLE they TRUSTED the citizens with the power because they did NOT trust the government. Think about what that means. You are in the ONLY country in the World that WE THE PEOPLE have the Individual Right to protect and defend OUR Families, Community and Country.
Unique Freedoms to any other country in the world that afforded US the ability to accomplish more in 200 + years than the rest of the world since the beginning of time.
And you want to give that away???
The Bill of Rights is like a Fire-Extingusher.
Better to have them and not need it.
Than to need it and not have it.
The 1st and 2A go hand and hand....
But the Second Amendment is the one Amendment that protects ALL the rest.
If your not working to protect our America and the Constitution then YOU are working to destroy it.
It is your turn to pass the torch of Freedom protected by the Bill of Rights to the next generation.
SBEZ
2:41 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
This isn't a pro gun/ anti gun issue. This reminds me of two girls fighting each other over a guy who though was their boyfriend but it turns out the guy was just sleeping with both of them. We shouldn't be fighting each other. We should be turning out attention to the source of the problem. These mass shooters are people who live in their own head, who think they have nothing to live for. So in stead of fading away they feel a need to validate their lives and the best way they see fit is to amass a body count. From their the media turns them into demigods over night. You want to stop mass shootings? Plaster the guy or girls face and name who stopped the mass shooting and treat them like a hero. Let these sociopaths go out the same way they came in. A nobody!
Marc
4:48 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
^ The media certainly does turn these once bullied, beaten, sad and lonely individuals into sort of OUTLAW ROCK STARS that's for sure.
There is now talk that Adam Lanza might've actually been a fan of (and trying to 'one up') that Norwegian mass shooter of two years ago.
He certainly would've seen just how much ATTENTION that the mainstream media bestowed upon the likes of that guy, James Holmes, Jared Lee Loughner etc.
Law Abiding Citizen Against Criminals
2:41 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
Question for NJ Residents For Action.. How would you protect yourself if a criminal picks you as their next victim and you have no time to call the police?
Marci Bandelli
9:04 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
Please all of you stop hiding behind the Second Amendment. Again, this is not about your 2a rights. Let me give you a real example of what we are talking about and stop the nonsense and clutter. Adam Lanza was 10 years old when the 1994 Assault Ban was allowed to EXPIRE. In the course of 10 years, Adam Lanza's mother was allowed LEGALLY to purchase military-style assault weapons and thousands of rounds of ammunition. Had that assaut ban not expired those beautiful people very likely would be alive today. So stop with the 2a rights. This is about a Federal Assault Ban on military style weapons and ammunition and background checks for all. That is sensible and necessary. You people want to cowardly hide behind the Second Amendment, have fun. But we are moving forward...and the public is on our side.
Law Abiding Citizen Against Criminals
9:24 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
We're not hiding behind it, we're protecting the constitution from finger pointng, liars that enable criminals to run this country into the ground.
SDJ
1:04 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
Marci , the rifle the mother had was ban compliant. The AWB never expired in NJ , NY , CT. Plus he had 2 handguns with him. The Virginia Tech shooter had 2 handguns , 10 round magazines , and killed 30 people. It is not WHAT they had , it is the fact that they had it at all. I am not against mental health background checks. The VT shooter would not have bought any gun here in NJ. Which is why additional laws that do not address the issue at hand - care of mentally ill and restricting their access to ANY gun - are a waste of time and money and will not impact crime. Banning so called "assault weapons" that are involved in less than 1% of all crime will do absolutely nothing except polarizing people like me and you who should/could be working together, If someone can't get a black plastic military "looking" rifle , they will just buy a ban compliant version.As someone who does not know firearms I do not expect you to know this..but even if the ban goes through the same weapons will still be readily available with wood stocks. It is the wrong track to be on for crime reduction , all it does is halt sensible talks between both sides of this issue.
Marc
2:18 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
Adam Lanza did in fact STEAL those firearms, he broke THAT law first as under both state and federal law he was NOT legally permitted to own them (he tried to legally obtain a firearm but was fortunately rejected so at least the system 'worked' in that regard).
By the very same token, if your neighbor's kid somehow steals your car or even the axe out of YOUR garage and goes on a killing rampage with them (heaven forbid) should we then protest to ban your particular brand of car and all axes?!
And once again Marci, Adam Lanza also stole his mother's Honda Civic that day. Had he instead chosen to wait for those kids/teachers to get out of school for the day and assemble in large groups outside waiting for the bus, brought that car up to 50+mph and aimed it just right he could've committed the very same (or worse?) atrocities as that's what sick or criminal minds do. James Holmes could've done the very same in that Colorado movie theater's parking lot.
Would you all then be calling for a ban/limitation on "military style assault Hondas"?
Let's start blaming (and trying to fix/prevent/stop) the perpetrators, not the tools that they choose.
"Military style assault weapons"? Another misnomer, a 'buzzword' made up by the mainstream media so that other uneducated and misguided figures such as Piers Morgan and politicians would have a "scary term" to grab onto for that 'emotional vote'.
Facts only please, not inaccurate falsehoods.
Greg Z
9:44 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013
Let's see how well your logic works.
Ban all GM cars.
"If it only saves 1 life"
There would be NO more car accidents.
You clearly don't understand what is taking place here.
You have an administration who is hiding behind the 2A.
Because they have NO real solutuions.
They are ALL talk.
I thought their # 1 priority was jobs?
Hmmmm???
Guess they can't remember what they read on a teleprompter.
This administration will place NO blame on criminals, gangs or illegals.
They only want to place more restrictions on law-abiding citizens.
Because this is NOT about guns.
This is about dismantling the Constitution.
And USING these Tragedies push THEIR agenda.
Which is NO secret if your eyes are open.
This administration is a complete FAILURE.
And using YOU as THEY hide behind the 2A..
Because they FAILED to deliver their FALSE pomises.
This 2A issue is a distraction to take the focus off THEIR FAILURES.
How about that executive order obama used to protect eric holder from THEIR FAILED Operation Fast & Furious that resulted in the death of U.S. Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry?
This is the same administration that is USING YOU to do their dirty work.
Trying to divide and conquer the country.
They liberal progressives who are trying to save the world by killing America.
And take YOU down with it....
Jack
9:18 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
The horrible truth is without the second ammendment, one day these gun grabbers will have nothing to gaurantee their right to hold their ridiculous protests.
SDJ
9:21 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
Karen is an exact example of people who are educated by the media and Hollywood . Karen , with all due respect your facts are wrong. They are looking to pass laws that are banning objects that are used in less than 1% of all gun crimes nationwide. Why should this matter to you , that so called "assault weapons" are only 1% of firearms used in a crime? Because this administration can change , and it probably will , quite rapidly , if the economy is not fixed in the next 3 years. Having people who do not know which end of the gun the bullets come out of writing these laws and supporting this laws with such vigor , it is NO different than a bunch of GOP men who neither have or understand the "equipment" making sweeping unjustified laws about women's reproductive health. Making knee jerk laws based on feeling that are not backed up by sheer numbers is a SLIPPERY slope and the next topic on the chopping board because be something that violates the rights of a non gun owner. If I thought ANY of these laws(federal or state) were going to do ANYTHING to keep my 3 school children safe I would supporting them 100%.They fall so far off the track it is pathetic.
Jay
9:24 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
you honesty beleive that if the "assault weapons" ban was in place this tragedy wouldn't of happened? I think Adam was clearly disturbed and should of been under constant supervision or institutionalize. That would of prevented the tragedy. I'm fairly confident he used what ever was at his disposal - it happened to be a rifle. It could of been a handgun, a shotgun, a bomb, arson , anything. If we really care about the safety of our kids (and I have 2) lets address these mental health issues. Mental health treatment is not locking a child in the basement to play video games. Lets have our children protected with trained armed professionals - no one seems to have a problem with armed guards in airports, Air Marshals on planes, armed guards at sports events, etc. why not at a school. Lanza chose a school because it was an easy target. Lets not make schools easy targets.
Jay
9:25 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
(Cont) These weapons are not military style - no military in their right mind would use these weapons. But I should have the right to defend my home with them. Look at the Plainfield riots in the 60's, post Katrina New Orleans, la riots- all of these examples are good examples of why I may chose to have a semi automatic rifle in my home. I respect your right to disagree with me but please don't disrespect my right. As far as the public being behind your view , we live in a republic protected by a constitution. If Publiic opinion ruled the day, we may still have slavery, segregation, women without voting rights etc. the USA is not mob rule. I hope you can understand my point of view.
HL
9:42 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
Nathan Ale, sorry but how many of those 8000 incidents where with legal handguns by law-abiding citizens? I beg to differ with your opinion.
LC
10:00 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
I would just like to say that, although I wish we did not have to fight so hard to retain the shreds of what passes for the 2A in NJ, I am very proud to be on your side, guys (and gals - Dee ; ) I just read through the thread this morning and we are an educated, honorable, patriotic group of people. The arguments from the other side are shrill, emotional, and baseless. Thank you all for standing up and speaking out.
HL
10:14 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
LC agree 100%, on that note I am willing to sit down with any of you and discuss issues as we see them and will even go so far as to take you to a range and provide you with some reality and education.....
LKB
11:52 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013
Arguments that sensible people against gun violence are Not baseless: Everyday33 people are murdered with guns-The Fix Gun Checks Act would help prevent future shootings by req. the BG check system contains the records of people already pro. by current law. BGC REFORMS do nothing to interfere with the ever-so precious, outdated 2nd Amm. b/t 40-48% of guns are sold by unlicensed.Private Sellers/gun buyers exploit vast private sale loophole by seeking out these private sellers online & at gun shows, yes,we know that G. shows don't take place in our beloved NJ.The irrelevant & uninformed protesters yesterday should become informed, about the WHY&WHO they were attempting to embarrass or intimidate w/dopey chants & nasty remarks.Come&join us in our mission for common-sense reform of our gun laws &fixing our nation's broken BG check system.
Other important and highly researched FACTS:
2007 - Seung-Hui Cho Killed 32 VA Tech students, faculty and wounded 25 others - deadliest mass shooting by a single gunman in US history. He used a Weather P22 semi-automatic purchased from www.thegunsource.com, owned by TBSCOM. Brett, Cho did pass the state and fed. BG checks because records of his severe mental illness had never been sent to the NICS database. Even the president of TGSCOM, Eric Thompson, agreed Cho should not have been able to pass a BG check. Cho also brought at least 5 ammunition clips on eBay. Bullets & ammo magazines are NOT subject to BG checks under federal law.
Brad Schaeffer
2:55 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
LKB, he used a WALTHER (not weather) P22 Semi-automatic PISTOL. Not covered by any "assault weapons ban." Semi-automatic, by the way, is simply one pull of trigger one shot without needing to re-cock or re-load. Almost every handgan, save revolvers, function this way.
And you say yourself here: "he did pass state and fed BG checks because records of his severe mental illness had never been sent to the NICS database." So THERE is the breakdown. Their is the weak link in the chain. It sounds like either: a) government bureaucracy prevented efficient screening (nothing that yet more government laws/regulations can't fix eh?) or the records were sealed due to come civil liberties ordinance. Either way no one with a mental illness should be allowed anywhere near a gun. Perhaps your movement should focus on keep guns out of the hands of such people, rather than those who know what to do with them, be they a Walther, a weather or a Waldo semi.
Marc
6:44 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
"ever-so precious, outdated 2nd Amm." you snidely and sarcastically say?
You see, it's talk like THAT which shows your TRUE colors.
What if I just as rudely referred to the 1st Amendment as "ever-so precious and outdated" like you just did and said stupid things such as "you SHOULD NOT be permitted to assemble in front of an office building on North Avenue in Westfield because it's a road hazard?
Or because it's a health hazard on cold windy days?"
You wouldn't like it very much either as it too would be WRONG (we all honor, respect and abide by that VERY important 1st Amendment right as well of course). So please STOP attempting to urinate all over the U.S. Constitution/Bill of Rights like that as those documents really ARE in fact "precious". THEY PROTECT YOU (and your children/grandchildren someday) AS WELL.
Please don't ever loose sight of that.
Nathan Ale
1:06 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
LKB as stated before... he used 10 round magazines and pistols.. which are semiautomatic... none of which you are targeting... lol if all yoir laws were passed none would effect thay
HL
1:11 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
LKB There is not a single legal firearm owner or supporter of the what the "outdated", 2nd amendment; as you put it, who doesnt join you in the idea that tragedy and mayhem is unacceptable. Fact I lived VA Tech twice with my family who was right there. Cho slipped through the cracks, or is it the story we are told? If he aimed to carry out his mission and couldn't get a gun, could he have used some other means to an end? Of course!! Salesman broke the law- punish him to the maximum possible sentence under current law, current law not enough make the penalty stronger, again close the revolving penal system door.... lets make some real strides at taking better care of the mentally ill as well, ----- is there a single proposal looking to do these things? No, lets blame the inanimate object, lets fall for all the gun grabbing, knee jerk propaganda put out by certain political parties aimed at making society dependent upon government...... I would much rather take responsibility for the safety and livelihood of mine and others than be forced to rely upon a government official---
HL
1:12 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
the proposals will absolutely reduce the amount of freedom to own and use firearms by reasonable law abiding citizens, while at the same time making them further prey to those who would have them be victims to their whim...whether it be robbery, rape, home invasion, car jacking, government gone bad, any number of things----- you feel confident waiting on 911 its your choice no one is forcing their will on you and making you go out and buy or carry a gun..... NICS system by the way was never completed do to lack of funding by the federal government, --- educate yourself its not like going out and buying a loaf of bread....... different arms different amount of round different scenarios..... gun free zones, no help, open door!
HL
1:12 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
oh and there is no such thing as a clip when referring to firearms in common use by common citizens today..... your lack of knowledge beams through
Marc
2:40 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
Yes, you've got to love someone who actually uses terms like "ammunition clips" (and/or "military style") when referring to a handgun magazine all while trying to sound 'credible' as they attempt to educate you about what they think is 'right or wrong' LOL.
SDJ
1:25 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
LKB- about the background checks in OTHER states and the Federal check having good and consolidated info?Yes,I agree.People like the VT shooter and the Aurora shooter should not have purchased firearms legally the way they did.They were under psychiatric care,the psychiatrists knew they were potentially dangerous.People around them knew they had issues.They would not have purchased ANY weapons in NJ.Which is why many of us NJ gun owners feel slapped in the face with new proposed restrictions that have NOTHING to do with the task at hand.Task being - preventing what happened in CT from happening anywhere again.If you take an ubiased scientific look at each mass shooting you will see that the amount of casualties is directly related to how long it takes police or somebody with a gun to arrive to stop them.Also , active shooter response plans.What happens in a school when someone attacks? The more intuitive the response /plan is , and the quicker first responders arrive,the less people are killed. I can't believe nobody sees that all these crimes occur in gun free zones. Added GFZs in NJ is just dumb. No citizens are allowed to conceal carry ,criminals are already breaking the law while carrying,what makes anyone think that criminal will stay away from gun free zones?Does anyone think a mass shooter who knows he is going to kill himself after killing other cares about GFZs? Actually,they know GFZs will afford them more time to kill before being interrupted by any heroes.
LKB
1:31 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
Missing the point, Gun Violence is a real epidemic here in our county. Fortunately NJ has tough state laws, but so many states don't. 8 KIDS die every 3 hours from gun deaths - do we continue to sit back and do nothing? 20 small defenseless children died in Newtown, how many babies, kids, woman, sons, daughters, men, woman have to die? What I would really love is for anyone who has commented in a negative manner to our peaceful rally yesterday to actually meet with a parent of one of those children in Newtown and look them in the eye and tell them, GUNS don't kill. Bottom line, this country is out of control with their amount guns and the beliefs as to why many Americans feel this need to have so many guns, so many bullets and no proper way to maintain public safety as it relates to gun deaths. The American gun-loving public has taken advantage, twisted the 2nd ammendment and now, yes, it's taken 20 small children to wake this country up out of this gun-loving fantasy and bring the gun-lovers of this country back to reality - GUNS do KILL. People are more important than your Guns. The gov't isn't swooping down to take back your weapons. We do live in a peaceful civilized country. We have trained police officers to handle violence, etc. We live in a peaceful nation, yet we have more guns per capita than any other industrialized country in the world. We rank #1 with owning more guns per resident than any other nation in the world - INSANE!!!ENOUGH is ENOUGH
Marc
2:48 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
Oh really LKB?
Please feel free to watch these two videos if you will, BOTH are of Newtown fathers speaking:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWDjrPyu_kM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wk-PC4Ro4J4
HL
1:55 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
CRIMINALS AND MENTALLY ILL ARE TO BLAME__ NO NEW LAW WILL CHANGE THAT---- all you are doing is giving them an open playing field!!!!! STOP bleeding the children of Sandy Hook dry---what about the hundreds of Chicago kids killed each year, DC and other areas where the public cant carry--- Newark, Camden, etc-----how many NJFID holders had anything to do with any of those crimes? zero fact go check it---- proven fact---- where the public is allowed to conceal carry firearms crime rates are lower than where not---why the criminal and nut jobs have no idea who might be there to stop him in his tracks....... I'm am also willing to bet money some of the people in your circle you would never think own firearms, do--- stop sounding like the general public wants to strap one on and march down the street firing at ever jerk who looks at him funny----- Concealed Carry Holders are more responsible than others--- they are not about to do anything that would cause them to loose that right---- yup felons no rights! Study the facts they are plenty out there!
LKB
2:08 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
HL, why is NJ firearm death rate ranked so low as compared to other states like Ohio & VA where you can carry concealed weapons? Seriously you should be checking your facts if you are going to make a lame attempt at why your Guns don't kill people, why your guns are more important than people. tough laws do make a difference, yours lame agruements aren't holding much weight anymore, sorry if this angers you - hopefully you won't use a gun to channel your anger - the way so many gun owners do.
Brad Schaeffer
2:44 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
LKB. As I pointed out to Karen, that is a misleading stat. Yes, NJ ranks low in overall firearm deaths. But in terms of firearm HOMICIDES we are in the top 20. Why the disparity? Because the majority of firearm deaths in America are self-inflicted...suicide or accident. So the less guns, the less gun suicides/accidents which will lower the overall death rate by type of device. But that is no indication of the safety of our streets or, to use your guys' default phrase 'the children.' Again, you must think deep and hard about these issues before toying with the Bill Of Rights. I care about all ten. To me this is not just about guns per se. But the security of a free state, to borrow a phrase. Is this were about censorship I'd be worries about the 1st Amendment. About police power v. due process I'd be worried about 3 through 8, the overrach of the federal government, number 10 and so on.
Jay
2:50 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
LBK - your fixation on firearms is interesting. I think it doesn't address the issue. If it did Chicago would be the safest place in the world or even Mexico which has a country wife ban on firearms. Lets pass laws that put criminals that comit crimes behind bars for a long time. Lets pass laws that instutuionalize mentally Ill people that have the propensity for violence. I'm sorry you hate the 2nd amendment. The fact is it exists and it's a right we have. It already is limited in many many ways. I wonder where you stand on abortion... Which by the way is not in the constitution or bill of rights...
c
2:52 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
You just proved the point that no new gun laws are needed in NJ! Thank you for agreeing. Case closed. Let's MOVE ON.
Lets work on mental health, gangs, drugs, recidivism due to lax judiciary and lack of programs, breakdown of hard work, respect, and the family breakdown. Lot's of work to do with just the last one. Lying and dishonesty is a big one, especially prevalent. It is unbelievable that Karen and her comrades don't take the time to listen to others with a differing viewpoint....kinda like Obama, Soros, Putin. My way or the highway mentality. Don't confuse my EMOTIONS with facts, right? I say respect the US Constitution/2nd Amendment or get a one way plane ticket to Western Europe. Remember your US history? Remember why the Colonies broke away from England and people fled Europe? Remember why your fathers fought in WWII?
LKB
3:12 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
Guns kill, people using the guns kill. We will never agree, but thankfully that's what our elected politicians are for. I take comfort in that especially since the republican party seems to be losing their power slowly, a little bit each day.
Marc
7:06 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
You seem quite smug, almost PROUD of that even.
I sure do hope that you (and your children/grandchildren/great grandchldren) don't have to someday pay the ultimate price that so many MILLIONS of other innocent 'well meaning' citizens had to over the last 60-90 years all over the world as a result of some of what you stand for right now in the short term.
"Oh stop the paranoia, that can't happen here!" you might say?
Slavery, Japanese-American internment (concentration) camps, segregation, government drones flying overhead, no more large cups of soda etc. etc.
It ALREADY HAS happened here.
Be careful what you wish for.
Greg Z
10:14 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013
I guess you take pride in the liberal democrats who are trying to save the world by killing America.
Notice how this administration will place NO blame on gangs, criminals or illegals.
How is your 1 gun a month leader corzine doing? I guess if you can buy only 1 car a month there would be no more accidents or rod rage? Hmmm?
Where is the $$$ corzine was responsible for?
How is your gun control leader jessie jackson jr doing?
Nice $43K Rolex he bought with YOUR Money?
What about YOUR gun control leader eric holder who was in charge of the FAILED Operation Fast & Furious that resulted in the death of U.S. Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry?
How about YOUR gun control leader menendez?
This is NOT about guns.
This is about dismantling the Constitution.
They want to destroy your Individual Rights
And make you dependent on government.
What happened to jobs being a number 1 priority in America?
Guess you can't remember what you read on a teleprompter?
You picked some good ones to get YOU to do their dirty work and distract the public because they have FAILED as leaders in their community to address the real problems and those who cause them.
This administration will place NO blame on criminals, gangs or illegals.
Or the parents who KNOW their kids are on the street breaking the law.
Now they have you HELPING them destroy the country.
Nathan Ale
3:13 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
Karen I emailed you for which you have yet to respond... we can avoid all this arguing.. I would to arrange a conversation where you can talk to me about your views. I feel there is a lack of eduxation on your part and hell lets even say there is one for mine... So please the email I sent you.. I encourage you to accept.
HL
3:16 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
Brad thanks had to get some work done or would have answered LKB sooner......
Jay
3:22 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
LBK - I noticed no reponse in the abortion comment. Figured as much
HL
3:23 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
LKB same offer as to Karen, willing to sit and chat or go on a field trip to the range of your choice for an education in things you know not of what you speak.... better yet just for the hell of it go apply for a NJ FID,.... you will wake up real quick!
LKB
3:29 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
typical you would say "misleading stat", is that your way of accepting ignorance as your platform? More reason why supporters of reducing gun violence will win this battle. We are informed. We are intelligent. We say "enough is enough" to your ignorance and fear-mongering. We will win eventually because fortunately more Americans are advocating for change than remaining stuck in the past.
Brad Schaeffer
4:00 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
That's my way of saying it is a misleading stat.
"Supporters of reducing gun violence." Me too. So it sounds like we're in the same camp. Great.
As to winning or whatever, be careful what you wish for. I don't doubt you're a good person. But remember what Henry Adams said; "It's always the good men who do the most harm in the world."
SDJ
3:39 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
LKB , according to the FBI stats for murder..you are , once again , wrong. Look at Virginia...LESS than NJ. Vermont - most lenient - MUCH LESS. Look at Illinois..look at the real numbers from a credible source rather than googling "far left opinions on guns" . California who has the toughest laws , had the most gun related murders. Really , enough with media fueled erroneous stats . The numbers are all over the place , REGARDLESS of how strict their gun laws are. It is about inner city crime and who has the most of it. If we got rid of that aspect we would have the same single digit firearm deaths per year other countries have.
http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2011/crime-in-the-u.s.-2011/tables/table-20
LKB
4:32 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
I'm actually a really good person, loyal and passionate. My passion for peace, less violence and fewer murders in the world will never stop no matter how much anyone makes an argument for why "guns are good" or why people need to have so many guns, or why people need to have high capacity magazines, - I just don't believe in it. So many Senseless deaths, so many senseless comments. My freedom to think, my choice. Just remember this Brad, "The world is not threatened by bad people, but by those who allow evil.
Albert Einstein
Brad Schaeffer
5:33 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
Yes. He meant that when you do not confront evil, when you remain passive before it, it will overwhelm you. That's why Einstein, despite being a pacifist, signed Leo Szliard's letter to FDR urging him to build the atomic bomb before Hitler built his own...that's a pretty BIG GUN don't you think?
HL
4:44 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
oh what a sad day it will be for some when then drones are overhead and the libs' messiah gives them that last glass of kool-aid before marching them into the ovens...
HL
5:27 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
"This year will go down in history. For the first time, a civilized nation has full gun registration! Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient, and the world will follow our lead into the future." --Adolf Hitler, 1935 Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the American people's liberty teeth and keystone under independence.... From the hour the Pilgrims landed to the present day, events, occurrences, and tendencies prove that to ensure peace, security, and happiness, the rifle and pistol are equally indispensable.... The very atmosphere of firearms everywhere restrains evil interference; they deserve a place of honor with all that's good... A free people ought to be armed." - George Washington I have yet to hear anyone afflicted with the "gun control" disability dial 9-1-1 and specify, "Now please be sure to send the kind of cops who are disarmed. If you can't do that, we'd rather you not send anyone at all to stop the men who are holding my daughter at knifepoint, because in this household we don't believe that guns ever solve anything." - Vin Suprynowicz, writer With guns in the hands of the public, sure there will be tragedies, but without them there will be genocides. Unknown source
Brad Schaeffer
5:28 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
Hitler never said that. It is an urban myth. Sorry.
HL
5:28 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
those who allow evil are the very ones who aim to restrict those who are willing to fight against it.............
Nathan Ale
5:47 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
LKB... Karen.. No one said you are a bad person. No one said you wanna take guns away, but the regulations you are supporting DO want to take guns away. They want to specifically strip me and 1 million other gun owners like me of the rights that I currently have. My standard PX4 I purchased will have illegal magazines that came with it because of possible legislation that is IN THE WORKS.. My wife who was in the military during the war is most likely on the terrorist watch list.. and now will be unable to own a firearm. Thank you so much for supporting our rights and protecting us from the murders THAT NEVER HAPPEN.
Newtown conneticut was the rarest kind of mass shooting of its time. Since then, and before never has one been quite like it.. so now we need to do a whole more in changing our gun laws? With more people dieing to handguns, specificly how are you expecting to save lives at all?
I pity anyone who expected to have the freedom to express our 2nd amendment rights for rights you felt were in danger by law abiding NJerians...
My offer to debate our philophies to go to a gun range, to EDUCATE YOU ON WHAT YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND still stands. I will email you my phone number if it helps.
HL
5:54 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
"The man who has no sense of history, is like a man who has no ears or eyes”
and yes I know its never been proven he said it-----
Mike
6:55 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
Dear NJ Residents for Gun Action: I believe in the Constitution, and therefore I believe in your right to say what you are saying. I vehemently disagree with you, but will defend your right to say it.
Marc
7:03 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
I agree. I'd even be willing TO DIE for their right to say it if need be, as so many other brave men and women have before.
Greg Z
10:14 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013
The Second Amendment is the ONE Right that PROTECTS ALL the others.
The 2A protects all the others from a tyrannical over-reaching government that wants to take them away.
That is why you have them in the First place.
The First Amendment puts them in writing.
And the Second Amendment protects the First.
The First and Second Amendment go hand-in-hand.
Treat them with respect and pass them down to the next generation as the previous generations did for you!
If you really want to solve the problems in America.
Focus more on following the Ten Commandments and the Bill of Rights.
HL
9:46 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
Karen......http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLrAbG9HtwM listen to the felon at about 2:50
Marc
9:56 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013
^ In case that link didn't come up for some of you:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLrAbG9HtwM
Karen Egert
7:58 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013
Marc -- you mean that . You'd be willing to DIE for my right to free speech ?
Wow -- hmmmm
Marc
7:31 am on Saturday, February 23, 2013
Yes. These Constitutional rights (ALL of them) of ours are THAT important and are much bigger than any one individual.
PLENTY have already died for your (and my) 1st Amendment rights...but you of course know that already. I hope. :-)
HL
8:52 am on Saturday, February 23, 2013
Marc- thinking Karen cant comprehend you or anyone else would put yourself on the line for our rights... all she and those like her know how to do is follow the leader...... she still hasnt answered what method she would use if ever caught in a do or die situation
Brad Schaeffer
12:44 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013
Karen. I'm not sure why that would surprise you. Take a trip to the Arlington Cemetery and you will find the graves of 400,000 brave Americans who have given their lives to preserve our rights. Gettysburg is a tad closer. You will find 3,500 there who gave their "last full measure of devotion." (It's much more difficult to preserve liberty that to strip it away.)
Greg Z
10:14 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013
The Second Amendment is the ONE Right that PROTECTS ALL the others.
The 2A protects all the others from a tyrannical over-reaching government that wants to take them away.
That is why you have them in the First place.
The First Amendment puts them in writing.
And the Second Amendment protects the First.
The First and Second Amendment go hand-in-hand.
Treat them with respect and pass them down to the next generation as the previous generations did for you!
If you really want to solve the problems in America.
Focus more on following the Ten Commandments and the Bill of Rights.
HL
8:10 am on Saturday, February 23, 2013
“Without tort liability, there’s no incentive to make guns safer,” Crownover said. “Congress enables makers and sellers of guns.” ------what exactly should the industry do to make guns safer.... remove the triggers??? wth is that comment ---
Greg Z
9:53 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013
It is amazing who quick people comment when they don't know the facts.
If you did....
You would know that a firearm manufacture will waste NO time to send a buyer of a broken gun (unsafe condition) a pre-paid address label to get the firearm back to fix the problem immediately.
Every proffession has a bad apple whether your a police officer etc.
Gun grabbing politicians seem to be breaking new records in breaking the law.
eric holder, jessie jackson jr and his wife, corzine and menendez.
But the MAJORITY of Legal firearm owners are among the safest people around.
Although it is a rare situation for a new firearm to break.
The firearm manufacture(s) respond way faster than an any of the automobile makers.
See this is the problem.
These people think they are an expert on guns when they never owned one or went through the intense background check in NJ to get one.
ALL these bills are designed to disarm the law-abiding public.
This administration will place NO blame criminals, gangs or illegals or themselves.
Because thisis their biggest voting bloc....
LKB
12:08 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013
Do gun laws work? Because strong gun laws are clearly associated with lower death rates, legislators should work to save lives in their communities by enacting smart gun laws.
http://smartgunlaws.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/gunlawsanddeathrates4.jpg
c
6:32 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013
As detailed in a February 21 press release, U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and U.S. Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) are pressing U.S. Attorney Gen Eric Holder and the Justice Department to explain why they have failed to prosecute the vast majority of convicted felons and fugitives from justice who are failing background checks under the National Instant Criminal Background Check System.
"While we understand that not every denial needs to be prosecuted, every case involving a fugitive from justice or felon in possession of a firearm should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law," wrote Graham and Gowdy. On Feb 22, U.S. House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary--led by Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.)--sent letters to President Obama and Holder demanding answers on lack of prosecutions and enforcement of our nation's existing gun laws. In letter to the President, the committee noted that, during Obama's administration, "federal firearms prosecutions have fallen to the lowest levels in over a decade." In a committee press release, Chairman Goodlatte said, "Before the President demands that Congress push through legislation to stifle the rights of law-abiding citizens, he should take care to enforce the laws that are already on the books."
"We must all be looking for ways to prevent senseless acts of violence and the taking of innocent life but the best place to start would be enforcing the laws that Congress has already enacted," concluded Goodlatte.
HL
9:44 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013
LKB theres nothing there to there to back up the claim..... just stats on deaths, hows CHICAGO for proof they dont work ?
Marc
8:49 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013
Yes, in some cities/towns, 'some' of the firearms laws do work.
And some of them do nothing at all other than make it more difficult for someone like YOU, a law abiding, tax paying, honorable member of the community, to obtain proper protection for yourself as well.
But I'm curious just how you feel about a city or even an entire state where regular/'run of the mill' civilians (NOT members of law enforcement) are permitted to actually carry their firearms on them (not just in their car/truck but literally on their person at all times) almost everywhere that they go?
New Jersey residents are generally NOT permitted to do this of course, but I'm wondering how you feel the level of firearm violence/homicide fares in those states that allow this?
I think you'd be SHOCKED at how well a society that is largely (and legally) well armed with handguns on their person actually behaves and functions overall.
Greg Z
10:18 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013
I've been and worked in many states where the 2A is not infringed.
Not only do you find more responsible adults.
You will also find more responsible children.
Who were raised by more responsible adults.
Greg Z
9:44 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013
This administration will place NO blame on criminals, gangs, illegals or themselves.
That is their biggest voting bloc....
Greg Z
9:53 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013
I want to see the gun control advocates that are doing the dirty work for eric holder, corzine, jessie jackson jr and menendez (all with a long gun grabbing record like pelosi, bloomberg and obama) have one of their gun ban demonstrations in Newark, Camden or Trenton at 2:00 a.m. in the morning. No police and no guns to protect themselves with. Like to see them put their $ where ther mouth is....
HL
10:58 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013
Greg Z you have a better chance of having a beer with Jesus of ever seeing that--
Marc
7:49 am on Sunday, February 24, 2013
They won't EVER do THAT...but they'll simply blame firearms of course as the sole reason why they fear attempting it.
Really
11:40 am on Tuesday, April 16, 2013
The laws are very strict on obtaining a gun license.
There is local access to the outside gun range on Sundays for practice and I heard
also on on Tooker Avenue somewhere???????
c
11:35 am on Thursday, April 18, 2013
As you all may know, the Senate voted down the first group of anti-constitution, people control bills yesterday, including the illegal gun registration scheme posing as the Trojan Horse called the Expanded Background Check. The "assault" gun ban failed also likely because there is no such thing. These devious people tried to make the MSR or modern sporting rifle, which is among the most popular rifle sold today, illegal, but failed.