Board of Health Chair Fires Back at Mayor's Letter

Samir Shah says Mayor Shehady's assertions about the Board of Health are false.

Springfield Board of Health Chair Dr. Samir Shah doesn’t think the whole story is presented in Ziad Shehady’s latest message from the Mayor.

The message, printed , is largely concerned with proposed changed to the board of health. The Board, presently composed of seven residents appointed by the , meets monthly and steers the Township’s health and safety regulations. Along with the Township Committee, it is one of two governmental bodies in Springfield that can pass ordinances. Under the proposed change to township ordinance, that configuration would be replaced by a board of health made up of the Township Committee members and two residents with expertise in public health.

While Shah took issue Shehady’s individual points, he said its premise was essentially flawed.

“His letter focuses on reducing cost,” Shah said. “It doesn’t focus on increased risk to residents.”

In his letter, Shehady says there was a lack of communication between the Board of Health and the Township Committee. Shah said that the Board members had reached out repeatedly to the Committee through letters and other communications and attributed the miscommunication to indifference from elected officials. 

“In 2010 and 2011, Jerry Fernandez was the town liaison to the Board of Health,” Shah said. “He only showed up to five meeting each year. He made it clear in 2011 he didn’t have time and wasn’t interested in contributing to Board of Health. His absence contributed to lack of communication.”

Shehady said that he made several overtures to the board members but received no response; he said that he attempted to reach the board and Health Department in March and April both via phone and email. Fernandez said that professional obligations prevented him from attending meetings in 2011 and that both he and members of the board of health asked that he be replaced as liasion. But he said that he teleconferenced into the meetings and that he was in constant contact with the board of health during emergencies like Tropical Storm Irene.

Shah also objected to Shehady’s characterization of the board as anti-business. In his message, Shehady accused the board of scaring vendors away from Springfield’s Farmers Market and forcing business to attend hearings instead of having full-time Health Department staff work with businesses. Shah said Shehady misrepresents the board and the health office’s approach to business violations.

“The staff work extensively with them,” Shah said, explaining that businesses are only brought in front of the board after falling short of requirements in three inspections in a year. “When we bring them to board hearings, we tell them to get their act together.”

He said that the board’s top priority is to make sure the public doesn’t get sick because of something preventable, which the majority of issues before the board are. 

“All of us want more investment and restaurants in downtown Springfield, but we don’t that to be a place where people get sick,” Shah said.

Shah also dismissed the accusation that the board was fear-mongering about animal scares. In the letter, Shehady says the board members are “using stories of coyotes to scare the public” despite that the health department only has legal jurisdiction over animal attacks when the animals are suspected of having rabies.

Shah emphasized that the July 2011 report of a coyote attack was both real and serious, with the victim requiring serious medical attention.  In addition, Shah noted that Deputy State Public Health Veterinarian Colin Campbell said that according to state law, when a coyote attacks a person or pet, it is considered a suspect rabid animal. In his Mayor's Message and in a subsequent interview, Shehady emphasized that wild animals are the responsibility of the the state Department of Wildlife and police.

In the letter, Shehady dismisses the need for an autonomous board. Shah said that autonomy was critical for a health board’s mission of pubic health.

“We’re only looking out for the health and safety of residents,” Shah said. “We’re not looking for reelection or for campaign donations from businesses or individuals.” 

He added: “In politics, you only need to please 51 percent of the people. In public health, if you only keep healthy from preventable causes that’s not good enough. Even 80 percent isn’t good enough.”

Shehady questioned the notion that the board members are above politics.

"All of the members of the board are appointed by the parties in power," Shehady said. "They are not above politics. They are political appointees."

Bruno June 13, 2012 at 02:15 AM
I attended this evening's township meeting and I have to say, it is sad to see that not more people came tonight to voice their opinions/concerns regarding the possible and imminent demise of our current BOH. Lack of involvement or interest, particularly on issues where the health of the community is at stake, only affords a government the opportunity to do what it wants. Case in point is the Springfield Improvement District (SID), which has been in existence for almost 2 years now with little to any citizen involvement and transparency. But I learned tonight from another resident that the SID has actually collected 300K ! Yet, with all that money, it has decided to hang up 100 banners throughout town marketing the businesses in town. What an improvement ! I wonder why that money isn't being used, or if it was used for something else??? Others should be asking the same questions. Nevertheless I have digressed from the topic at hand. For the folks who did attend tonight, they afforded some great commentary, for which one hopes the township committee actually listened to. Additionally, I find irony in the words of the Mayor's open letter, where he states, "There is no need for another layer of government to do as they please with your tax dollars" Great statement, but obviously misdirected because what the Mayor states should not happen, is in fact what he plans to do by "re-organizing" the BOH & getting rid of our community board members.
BART FRAENKEL June 13, 2012 at 02:28 AM
You're correct Missy, my apologies to Dr. Shah; no slight intended.
BART FRAENKEL June 13, 2012 at 02:40 AM
Bruno, I agree and was one of the people who weren't there, but not due to indifference. Unfortunately the one thing that I learned while serving on the TC is that the majority of people don't get involved until its too late or aren't even aware of what goes on within the township. An issue like this, where the potential for public safety being compromised, should get greater media exposure, since thats the only thing that will deter the mayor from pushing forward his agenda. He doesn't like to see his carefully cultivated image tarnished in the media. So maybe someone can reach out and get greater media exposure of this issue in order to get the mayor's attention.
Monkey Allen June 13, 2012 at 10:10 AM
I agree that this is a serious issue. And I can see why members and residents who are involved would get frustrated with the lack of response. While I believe it is the duty of each resident to keep themselves informed of relevant issues, I'm not sure that "media exposure" is the issue. I don't remember reading too much about the candidates in the media. I remember them making an effort to canvas neighborhoods to spread their message or mail out information and post signs. Why not get out and educate the residents?
Len June 13, 2012 at 01:07 PM
I would like to know how a TC member, who has pidgeons and dead lobsters in his restaurant (as per Gordon Ramsey's TV show), can even be considered to become a member of the BOH? Something's wrong here!


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »